Up next


Missile clearly seen hitting Beirut warehouse

Linda Kirby
Linda Kirby - 854 Views
482
854 Views
Published on 06 Aug 2020 / In News and Politics

I do not know where this video came from because someone sent it to me without giving me the origin of the video.

MY OTHER PLATFORMS:
All news links on my UGEtube video. YT gave me a strike for not using their approved news media.

PLEASE DONATE TO OUR OUTREACH MINISTRY TO HELP THOSE WHO ARE SICK: PAYPAL LINK: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
OUTREACH EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]

zoom.us for the computer and the app store for zoom cloud to use on your smart phone. You can find me on zoom using my email addy: [email protected] Our sessions are teachings, preaching, and fellowshipping.

https://usa.life/WGONews this is a Facebook type social media
I'm also on the new social media site called Parler look me up as WGON.

https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/@WGON

My email: [email protected] or [email protected]

www.whatsgoingonnews.net

Show more
2 Comments sort Sort by

broandrew
broandrew 1 month ago

If you look at all the other 10+ videos from locals phones on many YT channels, on the explosion in Beirut, you see a mushroom cloud, it looks nuclear to me. I am just a civilian who asks the Father on a continuous basis, what really happened? Who shot the missile? the deep state puppets for satan?

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
SliceOfLife
SliceOfLife 1 month ago

Not nuclear or a missile at all for that matter. Any cameras within 1-3 miles would be FRIED. EMP's friend. Let's use science here for a second: the multiple negative videos i've seen the ordinance is shaped the same in each video, you wouldn't get the same shape from multiple angles because based on your viewing angle, its going to look vastly different. Also when you slow it down, the ordinance is smooth in the frames where the video is choppy. Essentially it's a higher resolution than the original video. You wouldn't get a crisp outline on an object moving at that speed. Heck, most cameras can't even get a good outline of a dogs tail wagging, and that's wagging at maybe 20 mph on a very excited pitbull. Next, 2 explosions, yet the "bomb" was able to be seen in FRONT of the smoke all the way down to when it "hits" and explodes, when it should have entered the smoke, especially when the wind was a measly 7-10 mph that day. Lastly, the "bomb" goes below the water/ground level in the image. All I'm sayin here is, this video is a fake, and a bad one to boot.

Reply   thumb_up 1   thumb_down 0
Show more

Up next