Video Player is loading.

Up next


Direct Energy Weapon or Missile hits Beirut

SystemsofConsciousness
SystemsofConsciousness - 2,279 Views
198
2,279 Views
Published on 06 Aug 2020 / In News and Politics

Direct Energy Weapon or Missile?

Show more
4 Comments sort Sort by

broandrew
broandrew 4 years ago

If you look at all the other 10+ videos from locals phones on many YT channels, on the explosion in Beirut, you see a mushroom cloud, it looks nuclear to me. I am just a civilian who asks the Father on a continuous basis, what really happened? Who shot the missile? the deep state puppets for satan?

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Comrade Pikachu
Comrade Pikachu 4 years ago

THAT MISSLE WAS HUGE!!!! it was bigger than the building behind it. no way that just slipped by the radar....

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
SliceOfLife
SliceOfLife 4 years ago

This video is totally faked. For soooooo many reasons. To the creator of the actual video, I know you'll never see this, but, If you're going to release a fake video, please at least put some effort into it.... and don't try to mask the crappy quality of your edits by making the video a "negative"....

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Jeffr13
Jeffr13 4 years ago

Actually, it's a tactical nuclear missile! https://www.voltairenet.org/article210679.html

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
SliceOfLife
SliceOfLife 4 years ago

Not nuclear, or a missile at all for that matter. Any cameras within 1-3 miles would be FRIED. EMP's friend. Let's use science here for a second: the multiple negative videos i've seen the ordinance is shaped the same in each video, you wouldn't get the same shape from multiple angles because based on your viewing angle, its going to look vastly different. Also when you slow it down, the ordinance is smooth in the frames where the video is choppy. Essentially it's a higher resolution than the original video. You wouldn't get a crisp outline on an object moving at that speed. Heck, most cameras can't even get a good outline of a dogs tail wagging, and that's wagging at maybe 20 mph on a very excited pitbull. Next, 2 explosions, yet the "bomb" was able to be seen in FRONT of the smoke all the way down to when it "hits" and explodes, when it should have entered the smoke, especially when the wind was a measly 7-10 mph that day. Lastly, the "bomb" goes below the water/ground level in the image. All I'm sayin here is, this video is a fake, and a bad one to boot.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Show more

Up next